Corporate Responsibility

motorola.com
About Us
Jump to Performance and Goals

Monitoring

Monitoring helps us identify suppliers whose practices do not align with our values and policies. It also raises awareness of our requirements and enables us to target opportunities to improve standards by taking corrective action.

We focus our monitoring program on direct-materials suppliers that pose a high risk and those with which we want to establish deeper, longer-term relationships.

We assess potential and existing suppliers for conformance with our supplier code of conduct. In addition to our assessments, we investigate reports of potential corporate responsibility issues from internal and external sources.

While monitoring is important, we believe that lasting improvements will only be achieved if suppliers have the capability to manage worker rights and environmental impacts themselves. Read about our capability building efforts.

Monitoring process

We take a risk-based approach to supplier monitoring that is modeled on the Global e-Sustainability Initiative/Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition supplier engagement model:

  • Self-assessment questionnaires in which suppliers provide information on their environmental and labor policies and management systems using the online tool, E-TASC. E-TASC provides customers with information and associated risks presented by suppliers, to identify areas for improvement and to target our on-site audits.
  • Detailed on-site audits conducted by a third-party firm commissioned by Motorola Solutions. We decide which facilities to audit based on information collected through the self-assessment questionnaires, specific reports made to our Ethics Line and other reporting channels, along with risk factors such as activity, location and reputation. Following the audit we provide feedback to suppliers and work with them to correct the issues identified. We may use a follow-up audit, conducted by a third party or our supply chain team, to verify that suppliers have made the necessary improvements.

Categorizing findings

Motorola Solutions has established four levels of severity for issues identified through monitoring:

  • Priority Red: Severe issues that require immediate escalation to our senior management, including child labor, debt labor, illegal dumping of hazardous materials and serious sanitary, health and safety conditions
  • Priority One: Legal-compliance issues or other issues that represent significant risk
  • Priority Two: Non-compliance with contractual terms, our expectations or other applicable codes or standards
  • Priority Three: Opportunities for improvement

Responding to findings

We want our suppliers to succeed, and we prefer to work with them to correct non-conformance issues identified in on-site audits. We want to work with our suppliers to improve labor and environmental conditions, because the situation for workers can deteriorate if we simply terminate contracts. In serious cases, we will place the supplier on "new-business hold" — meaning no new business will be placed until the issue is resolved. If a supplier refuses or is unable to cooperate, we will terminate the relationship as a last resort.

For Priority Red, we require immediate containment actions to prevent the issue from worsening and to mitigate the negative impact. We require corrective actions for issues at all levels except Priority Three. We ask suppliers to provide a date for completion and work with them until all issues are resolved. These deadlines are set on a case-by-case basis, and it may take several months to resolve the most complex issues.

Since implementing our supplier code of conduct in 2003, we have not terminated a contract solely because of corporate responsibility issues. We have, however, refused to enter relationships with new suppliers for this reason.

Management reviews

We use management reviews to track progress against our supply chain goals. Each quarter, senior procurement managers assess progress against a scorecard, which includes metrics for the number of open and closed supplier audit issues.

Beyond tier-one suppliers

Through our supplier agreements, we require our tier-one suppliers (suppliers from which we buy directly) to monitor the corporate responsibility performance of their suppliers. We also require them to provide a list of their suppliers (our tier-two suppliers) on request.

Tier-two suppliers are not included in our regular audit schedule, although we may take part in joint audits with our tier-one suppliers in response to specific reports of issues at their suppliers.

Read about our efforts to improve standards in the minerals supply chain.

Show all

Performance and goals

By the end of 2010, we obtained or requested self-assessment questionnaires from the majority of our preferred suppliers. We use E-TASC, the self-assessment tool developed by the Global e-Sustainability InitiativeElectronics Industry Citizenship Coalition industry collaboration.

In 2010, we conducted 30 site audits of Motorola Solutions suppliers:

  • Twenty six planned as part of our normal visits to suppliers
  • Four conducted in response to reports from internal or external parties

When combined with site audits of Motorola Mobility suppliers, we met our combined goal for 2010 of 40 audits.

In 2010, we conducted 40 percent of audits outside China to gain a greater understanding of the most common issues in individual countries. We conducted audits in China, Hungary, India, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines and Singapore.

As part of our focus on capability building, we are using the knowledge gained through auditing to develop training programs tailored to match the needs of individual countries.

  2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Motorola Solutions 2010
Number of in-depth audits
Number of in-depth audits 20 75 80 40 40 30

Audit findings in summary

When we identify issues during an on-site audit, we require the supplier to develop a corrective action plan. We ask them to provide a date for completion and work with the supplier until all issues are resolved.

As of 31 December 2010, Motorola Solutions suppliers had resolved more than 271 issues, or 42 percent of issues identified in 2010.

Most common supplier audit findings in 2010
Emergency preparedness 63
Management accountability and responsibility 52
Working hours 50
Occupational injury and illness 44
Hazardous substances 43

 

Goals for 2010 Progress in 2010 Plans for 2011
Supplier corporate responsibility goals
Conduct 40 in-depth, on site supplier audits. Achieved. Motorola conducted 40 audits. This figure includes 30 audits of Motorola Solutions suppliers. Continue risk-based assessment program.

Detailed audit findings

  Europe, Middle East and Africa Asia Pacific Total
Detailed supplier audits by finding
Type of supplier audited      
Tier 1 – Part/Component 0 20 20
Tier 1 – Electronic manufacturing process / original design manufacturer 1 9 10
Tier 2 0 0 0
Total 1 29 30
       
Reason for audit      
Planned (P) 1 21 22
Issue response (I) 0 4 4
New suppliers (N) 0 4 4
Follow-up (F) 0 0 0
       
Number of issues identified      
Ethics      
Business integrity and no improper advantage 0 3 3
Disclosure of information 0 2 2
Protection of intellectual property 0 2 2
Protection of identity 0 2 2
Fair business, advertising and competition 0 1 1
Community engagement 0 0 0
Labor      
Freely chosen employment 0 6 6
Child labor avoidance 0 15 15
Underage workers 0 0 0
Protection of workers aged 16 and 17 0 0 0
Working hours 1 49 50
Wages and benefits 0 29 29
Humane treatment 0 10 10
Non-discrimination 0 3 3
Freedom of association 0 2 2
Health and safety      
Occupational safety 0 21 21
Emergency preparedness 3 60 63
Occupational injury and illness 0 44 44
Industrial hygiene 0 24 24
Physically demanding work 0 18 18
Machine safeguarding 0 5 5
Dormitory and canteen 0 18 18
Environment      
Environmental permits and reporting 0 16 16
Pollution prevention 0 2 2
Hazardous substances 1 42 43
Wastewater and solid waste 0 11 11
Air emissions 0 11 11
Product content restrictions 0 0 0
Management system      
Company commitment 0 19 19
Management accountability and responsibility 0 52 52
Legal and customer requirements 0 19 19
Risk assessment and risk management 0 35 35
Performance objectives with implementation plan and measures 0 22 22
Training 0 21 21
Communication 0 13 13
Worker feedback and participation 0 13 13
Audits and assessments 0 20 20
Corrective action process 0 17 17
Documentation and records 0 12 12
TOTAL – ALL AUDITS 5 639 644
Percent of supplier issues closed/resolved   42%  


Audit findings analysis

Freely chosen employment

In 2010, we identified six issues related to freely chosen employment. The issues primarily related to: holding of foreign contract workers passports; restriction of workers’ mobility at work; lack of formal terms and conditions in worker contracts; and lack of policies or procedures for the management of foreign contract works by labor brokers. We are working with the suppliers to resolve these issues.

Child labor avoidance

The 15 issues relating to child labor avoidance related to lack of policies or procedures in place at a facility to verify the age of workers. No under aged workers were identified in audits.

Working hours

Similar to prior years, excessive or higher than legally permitted working hours was one of the most common findings of the onsite audits conducted in 2010, with 50 instances identified. We measure suppliers’ working hours against our supplier code, industry norms and applicable legal requirements. This means that a single supplier can have multiple working hours-related findings.

Corrective actions to reduce working hours continue to be a significant challenge for many factories in China that need to balance workers’ monetary needs, availability of labor and production requirements along with labor standards.

In 2010, Motorola continued its approach of monitoring suppliers’ progress in reducing working hours according to approved plans.

Wages/benefits

There were 29 in findings relating to incorrect payment of wages and benefits in 2010. The most common findings related to miscalculation of wages for overtime hours and the absence of a comprehensive pay statement to help workers understand their compensation. Motorola will continue to work with suppliers to resolve the outstanding issues.

Humane treatment

Ten audit findings related to humane treatment. The findings involved: lack of written rules and regulations regarding disciplinary procedures and lack of training for supervisors in this area; lack of procedures to investigate reports of inhumane treatment against workers; no written grievance procedures; and no policies and procedures for sick leave and maternity leave. We are working with the suppliers to resolve these issues.

Non-discrimination

The three non-discrimination findings related to a lack of written policies on non-discrimination and no written grievance procedure. We are working with the suppliers to resolve these issues.

Freedom of association

There were two findings in this area, which involved lack of written policies and procedures addressing freedom of association. We are working with the suppliers to resolve these issues.

Occupational safety

Of the 21 occupational safety findings, most involved an absence of, or improper use of personal protection equipment. Findings also related to lack of proper training in chemical handling and chemical exposure. Suppliers have completed or are implementing corrective actions.

Emergency preparedness

There were 63 findings relating to emergency preparedness, making it the most common finding. Deficiencies identified included insufficient fire or evacuation drills, blocked exits, blocked or missing fire extinguishers, lack of proper eyewash stations, and lack of fire exit signage and or exit lighting. Suppliers with these issues either have completed, or are implementing corrective actions.

Occupational injury and illness

Of the 44 occupational injury and illness findings, most related to general safety related issues including lack of programs, improper training, worker exposure, lack of personal protection equipment and chemical handling.

Suppliers with these issues either have completed or are implementing corrective actions.

Hazardous substances

The fifth most common finding with a total of 43 instances. The majority of these findings related to improper storage of chemicals and lack of proper chemical data sheets. Suppliers have completed or are implementing corrective actions.

Management accountability and responsibility

There were 52 findings relating to management accountability and responsibility, making it the second most common finding. These involved lack of formal management systems, goals, policies and procedures. We are working with the suppliers to resolve these issues.